Sourcing and landed cost

Supply continuity planning

How to map single points of failure, choose between a second site and buffer stock, and set triggers that turn a plan into action.

QKQumek Trade Desk··9 min read·Updated
INFOB

Key takeaways

  • Start with the parts and processes where a single failure would stop a line, not with a generic risk list.
  • A second site, a second supplier and buffer stock solve different problems and carry different costs.
  • Every plan needs a trigger, a decision owner and a recovery time, or it will not be used.
  • Test the plan with a tabletop exercise before a real disruption tests it for you.

What continuity planning covers

Supply continuity planning is the work of making sure a part keeps arriving when something goes wrong. The event may be inside the supplier, such as a fire or a machine failure, or outside it, such as a port closure, an export restriction, a power cut or a currency crisis. The plan describes what you will do, who decides and how long recovery takes.

It is not the same as a business continuity plan for your own site, and it is not a supplier audit. It is a part level view of exposure, tied to the production schedule and the customer commitments behind it. A plan that covers every part equally is not a plan. It is a list.

The output should be short enough to use in a real event: a ranked list of exposures, the mitigation already in place, the trigger for action and the recovery time if the mitigation is not enough.

Map the exposure first

Start with the bill of materials and the production schedule. For each part, record the supplier, the site, the lead time, the annual spend, the number of qualified alternatives and the tooling ownership. Then mark the parts where one failure would stop a line or breach a customer commitment.

Look beyond the tier one supplier. A single source at tier two, a single plating line, a single heat treatment furnace or a single tool can be the real point of failure. Ask the supplier for the process route and identify the steps that only one site can perform.

Rank the exposures by the time to recover and the impact of a stop. A part with a two week recovery and a large buffer is less urgent than a part with a twelve week recovery and no alternative. The ranking is what drives the spend.

  • Single site, single machine or single special process
  • Single tool with no validated duplicate
  • Long lead time with no qualified alternative
  • Material or sub-supplier concentration in one region
  • A route with one port, one carrier or one customs entry point
  • A supplier with financial or capacity stress

Second site, second supplier or buffer stock

A second site within the same supplier is often the cheapest form of redundancy, because the drawings, the quality system and the process are already approved. It only works if the second site has the same process and can be qualified on the same tool or an identical one.

A second supplier gives more independence, but costs more to qualify and may produce a slightly different part. It is the right choice when the risk is concentrated in one company rather than one building.

Buffer stock is the fastest mitigation and the least strategic. It buys time while another option is developed, but it ties up cash, occupies space and expires. Use it as a bridge with a defined review date, not as a permanent substitute for a second source.

Choosing a continuity measure for one part
MeasureBuysCostsBest when
Second site, same supplierBuilding or machine redundancyQualification and possibly a second toolThe supplier has a capable second plant
Second supplierCompany level independenceTooling, FAI, audits and split volumeThe part is critical and the market has alternatives
Buffer stockImmediate time to recoverCash, space and obsolescenceRecovery is long and a second source is not ready
Dual toolingProtection against tool failureA second tool and maintenanceOne tool carries a high volume part
Route flexibilityProtection against a port or carrier failureFreight premium and planning effortThe part moves on a single lane

Most critical parts need a combination. Buffer stock covers the gap while a second source is qualified, then reduces once the source is live.

Sizing buffer stock

A buffer is not a guess. It should cover the time to detect a disruption, the time to decide, the time to activate the alternative and the time for the alternative to deliver. Add the normal demand variation over that period.

For illustration, if detection takes one week, the decision takes two days, the alternative needs eight weeks to deliver and demand varies by ten percent, the buffer needs to cover roughly nine to ten weeks of average demand plus the variation. That is a large commitment, which is why the recovery time matters more than the buffer size.

Review the buffer when the recovery time changes. A second source that cuts recovery from ten weeks to three weeks should cut the buffer, and the cash released is part of the return on the qualification spend.

A buffer without a trigger becomes permanent stock

Write down the event that releases the buffer, who authorises it and how it is replenished. Without that, the stock sits in the warehouse until it is obsolete.

Set the triggers

A trigger is an observable event that starts a response. It should be specific enough that two people would agree it has happened. Vague triggers such as a supplier looking stressed are not usable in a real event.

Each trigger needs an owner, an action and a review point. The owner is the person who decides whether to escalate, not the person who notices. The action should be the first step of the plan, not the whole plan.

  • A shipment is more than five working days late without a confirmed new date
  • A supplier misses two consecutive promised dates
  • A quality lot is rejected and the supplier cannot confirm containment within two days
  • A public event affects the supplier's region, port or raw material
  • A supplier signals a capacity, cash or ownership change
  • A tool reaches the end of its planned life without a replacement

Test the plan

A plan that has never been used is a hypothesis. Run a tabletop exercise once a year for the top exposures. Give the team a scenario, such as a fire at the primary site, and walk through detection, decision, activation and recovery.

The exercise usually reveals that the contact list is out of date, the alternative supplier has no current drawing, or the buffer is smaller than the plan assumes. Those are cheap findings in a meeting and expensive findings in a crisis.

Record the actions and close them. A tabletop exercise that produces a report but no change is a rehearsal for the same failure.

Keep the plan current

Continuity planning is not a one-off project. Suppliers change, tooling wears, routes shift and volumes move. Put the plan on the same review cycle as the supplier scorecard and update it when a drawing, a site or a source changes.

Assign an owner for the plan as a whole and an owner for each critical part. Review the top exposures at the quarterly business review, with the recovery time and the mitigation status on one page.

The measure of a good plan is not how long the document is. It is how quickly the team can answer three questions: what would stop us, what would we do, and who decides. If those answers are clear, the plan will work when it is needed.

Keep the plan where the team can reach it during an incident. A file on a shared drive that nobody can find at eight in the evening is no better than no plan. Print the contact list, or store it where it can be opened without a network connection.

Frequently asked questions

What is a supply continuity plan?

A part level plan that identifies where a single failure would stop supply, the mitigation in place, the trigger for action and the recovery time. It is reviewed on a set cycle and tested with a tabletop exercise.

Is buffer stock a substitute for a second source?

No. Buffer stock buys time while an alternative is developed or activated. It ties up cash and can become obsolete, so it should have a review date and a plan to reduce it once a second source is live.

How much buffer stock should we hold?

Cover the time to detect the event, decide, activate the alternative and receive the first delivery, plus normal demand variation. The number is driven by recovery time, so shortening recovery is usually better than increasing the buffer.

How often should the plan be tested?

At least once a year for the top exposures, and after a significant change in supplier, site, tooling or volume. The test should walk through a realistic scenario and produce actions with owners and dates.

Sources and further reading

  • ISO 22301:2019, Business continuity management systems
  • ISO 9001:2015, Quality management systems, requirements
  • Qumek supply risk reviews and programme continuity notes
QK

Qumek Trade Desk

Trade and logistics team

The team that handles Incoterms, customs classification, freight and landed cost for Qumek programmes.

Review continuity for a critical part

Send the part, the supplier and the recovery time you need. The trade desk will reply with an exposure note and a suggested measure.

Request a continuity review
Sourcing9 min read

Volume breaks and MOQ economics

A lower unit price at a higher quantity is not automatically a better deal. Setup, tooling, inventory and the supplier's minimum order quantity decide where the saving stops.

Read

The Qumek dispatch

One useful email a month

Drawing notes, supplier checks, tariff changes and the questions buyers keep asking. No newsletter filler, no daily drip.

One email a month. No spam, no list sharing.