Key takeaways
- 302 is the default for dry indoor springs where strength and cost matter.
- 316 adds molybdenum, which improves resistance to chlorides and chemical exposure at a higher material cost.
- Cold worked 302 generally reaches a higher spring temper strength than 316, so a swap can change load and fatigue.
- Neither grade is immune to pitting or crevice corrosion, and passivation is part of the specification, not an optional extra.
The short answer
Use 302 for springs that see clean, dry, indoor conditions and need the best strength for the money. Use 316 where the spring sees chlorides, marine air, cleaning chemicals, food contact or a wash-down environment, and accept the lower strength and higher cost that come with it.
The decision is rarely about a single number. It is about the environment, the stress level, the finish, the life required and the volume. A 316 spring that is overstressed can fail sooner than a 302 spring that is comfortably loaded, so grade selection and stress design go together.
What the two grades actually are
Both are austenitic stainless steels. Type 302 is the classic 18/8 family grade, with roughly 17 to 19% chromium and 8 to 10% nickel, and a carbon content that helps it reach high strength after cold drawing. Type 316 has roughly 16 to 18% chromium, 10 to 14% nickel and 2 to 3% molybdenum. The molybdenum is the key difference for corrosion.
Spring wire is supplied in a cold drawn condition, because the drawing operation raises the tensile strength and sets the spring temper. The same grade can be supplied at different tensile levels, so the wire specification matters as much as the grade name. A 302 at one tensile range is not interchangeable with a 302 at another.
The low carbon variants, 304L and 316L, are common in sheet and bar but less common in spring temper wire. Low carbon reduces the risk of sensitisation at high temperature, but it also limits the strength that cold work can develop. If a drawing calls for 316L spring wire, check that the temper and strength are actually available.
Corrosion: where 316 earns its cost
Stainless steel protects itself with a passive chromium oxide layer. That layer is stable in clean air and fresh water and much less stable in the presence of chlorides, which can break it down locally and start a pit. Molybdenum in 316 improves the stability of the layer in chloride environments, which is why 316 is the usual choice for coastal, marine and chemical exposure.
The improvement is relative, not absolute. 316 will still pit in a strong chloride environment, especially in a crevice where oxygen cannot reach the surface. A spring sitting in a damp pocket, under a washer or inside a closed housing is in a crevice, and that is where failures appear even when the grade is correct.
302 is a reasonable choice for indoor equipment, dry enclosures and clean industrial air. It is also used where the spring is oiled or protected by a housing. It is not the grade for a salt spray environment, a marine deck, a dishwasher or a chlorine cleaning regime. Passing a salt spray test is not the same as surviving years of service, because the test is a screening tool, not a life prediction.
Strength, temper and fatigue
Cold drawn 302 can reach a higher tensile strength than 316 at the same wire diameter, and that usually translates into a higher allowable stress and a stiffer, stronger spring. The gap is not enormous, but it is enough to matter in a design that is already close to its stress limit.
The practical consequence is that swapping 302 for 316 in an existing design can reduce the load at a given height and change the fatigue margin. It can also change the amount of springback during coiling, so the free length and the leg positions may move. A grade change is a design change, and it needs a new first article with load testing.
Fatigue in stainless spring wire depends on the stress range, the surface condition and the environment. 316 is not automatically better in fatigue. In a corrosive environment it may last longer because it pits less; in a clean environment the higher strength of 302 may give the longer life. The answer depends on which mechanism is limiting the part.
A decision table for the two grades
Use the table to narrow the choice, then confirm the stress and the finish. The rows describe the conditions that most often decide the grade on a real drawing.
| Condition | 302 | 316 |
|---|---|---|
| Dry indoor air | Suitable | Suitable but unnecessary |
| Coastal or marine air | Not recommended | Preferred |
| Chloride cleaning chemicals | Not recommended | Preferred |
| Food and wash-down areas | Check the standard | Usually preferred |
| Highest spring temper strength | Better | Lower |
| Fine wire availability | Wide | Narrower |
| Relative material cost | Lower | Higher |
| Magnetic response after cold work | Noticeable | Noticeable but usually lower |
Grade choice is only part of the specification. Passivation, stress relief and the stress level decide whether the part lasts.
Magnetism, temperature and other practical differences
Austenitic stainless is nominally non-magnetic, but cold working transforms some of the structure to martensite, which is magnetic. A cold drawn spring wire is therefore often slightly magnetic, and a tightly coiled 302 spring can be more magnetic than a straight length of the same wire. If a sensor or a magnetic clamp is nearby, test the finished part rather than relying on the grade name.
At elevated temperature, 302 is more prone to sensitisation, where chromium carbides form at the grain boundaries and leave the adjacent metal short of chromium. That reduces corrosion resistance. 316 resists this better, and the low carbon grades better still. If the spring runs hot and wet, the combination is worth a specific review.
Both grades are austenitic and tough at low temperature, but the application temperature range should still be stated. A spring that is fine at room temperature may lose load at 200 C or become brittle in a cryogenic assembly. Those are design conditions, not grade marketing points.
How to specify the grade on a drawing
Name the grade, the wire standard and the temper or tensile range. Add the finish: passivation to a named standard, or a coating if the environment needs one. State the environment in words as well, because the grade alone does not tell the supplier whether the part will see chlorides.
If the spring is critical, ask for the wire certificate with the heat number and the tensile result, and add a load test at the installed height. For a coastal or chemical application, add a corrosion test that reflects the service, and record the acceptance criteria before the first batch is made.
- Grade and wire standard, with the temper or tensile range
- Passivation standard and any coating
- Service environment, including chlorides and wash-down
- Load at installed height and at working height
- Corrosion test method and acceptance, if required
- Wire certificate and heat traceability
Frequently asked questions
Is 316 always better than 302 for springs?
No. 316 is better in chlorides and some chemical environments, but 302 usually reaches a higher spring temper strength and costs less. In a dry indoor application, 302 is often the better engineering choice.
Can I swap 302 for 316 without changing the design?
Not safely. The load at a given height, the springback during coiling and the fatigue margin can all change. Treat the swap as a design change and ask for a first article with a load test before releasing production.
Does passivation replace the need for 316?
No. Passivation restores and thickens the passive layer after machining or handling, but it does not add molybdenum. In a chloride environment, passivated 302 will still pit sooner than 316.
Why is my stainless spring magnetic?
Cold working the wire during drawing and coiling transforms some austenite to martensite, which is magnetic. The effect is normal and does not mean the grade is wrong, but it can matter near sensors, so test the finished part if magnetism is a concern.
Sources and further reading
- EN 10270-3:2011, Steel wire for mechanical springs, Stainless spring steel wire
- ASTM A313/A313M, Standard specification for stainless steel spring wire
- ASTM A967/A967M, Standard specification for chemical passivation treatments for stainless steel parts
Qumek Engineering Desk
Engineering team
The engineering team behind Qumek drawings, DFM notes, tolerances and inspection standards. Every guide is reviewed against the drawings and processes used on live programmes.
Choosing between 302 and 316 for a spring?
Send the environment, the load and the drawing. The engineering desk will check the grade, the stress and the finish together.
Send the application